5分钟内做完一篇阅读，第二弹，直播完毕，欢迎讨论

昨天晚上，海豚心血来潮，出了一个5分钟内做完一篇文章的帖子，同学还是有一些疑问，所以海豚今天进行第二篇文章的直播。
http://bbs.freekaoyan.com/thread-329338-1-1.html这个是昨天的帖子。

好的，现在开始我们的第二篇文章，我会把题目贴出来的，大家跟着帖子走就可以了，不用再去翻书。

主要的不是考大家，而是教大家做题的方法，希望大家能够举一反三。
如果觉得自己有所收获的话，不妨自己也那一题真题来练习，像海豚这样做。
能把一篇文章分析完的话，帖子给大家加精华哦！加油吧！
如果有兴趣的话，请单发一个自己的学习帖，注明“作业”


这是08年的第2篇

这是原文，一共四段，我们一起来看一下

It used to be so straightforward. A team of researchers working together in the laboratory would submit the results of their research to a journal. A journal editor would then remove the authors’ names and affiliations from the paper and send it to their peers for review. Depending on the comments received, the editor would accept the paper for publication or decline it. Copyright rested with the journal publisher, and researchers seeking knowledge of the results would have to subscribe to the journal.

No longer. The Internet – and pressure from funding agencies, who are questioning why commercial publishers are making money from government-funded research by restricting access to it – is making access to scientific results a reality. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has just issued a report describing the far-reaching consequences of this. The report, by John Houghton of Victoria University in Australia and Graham Vickery of the OECD, makes heavy reading for publishers who have, so far, made handsome profits. But it goes further than that. It signals a change in what has, until now, been a key element of scientific endeavor.

The value of knowledge and the return on the public investment in research depends, in part, upon wide distribution and ready access. It is big business. In America, the core scientific publishing market is estimated at between $7 billion and $11 billion. The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers says that there are more than 2,000 publishers worldwide specializing in these subjects. They publish more than 1.2 million articles each year in some 16,000 journals.

This is now changing. According to the OECD report, some 75% of scholarly journals are now online. Entirely new business models are emerging; three main ones were identified by the report’s authors. There is the so-called big deal, where institutional subscribers pay for access to a collection of online journal titles through site-licensing agreements. There is open-access publishing, typically supported by asking the author (or his employer) to pay for the paper to be published. Finally, there are open-access archives, where organizations such as universities or international laboratories support institutional repositories. Other models exist that are hybrids of these three, such as delayed open-access, where journals allow only subscribers to read a paper for the first six months, before making it freely available to everyone who wishes to see it. All this could change the traditional form of the peer-review process, at least for the publication of papers.

It used to be so straightforward. A team of researchers working together in the laboratory would submit the results of their research to a journal. A journal editor would then remove the authors’ names and affiliations from the paper and send it to their peers for review. Depending on the comments received, the editor would accept the paper for publication or decline it. Copyright rested with the journal publisher, and researchers seeking knowledge of the results would have to subscribe to the journal.

像上次一样，找主题句，是第一句吧？后面都是表现怎样straightforward的， researchers 给a journal editor，journal editor再给peers 等等等等，都是描述一个过程的，是不是就暂时不用看了？能扫一眼，知道是说发表论文的，就ok了，对不？有个大概的印象就行了。

好，我们来看看主题句：It used to be so straightforward.
这一句虽然短小，但是也耐人寻味，这里面最重要的是那个部分？straightforward？
No！最重要的是 used to be ，“过去是”，这说明什么啊？这是过去的状况，对不对？知道这个是过去的就行了，一般文章写出来，都是要着重讲新事物的，那么这个过去的状态，是不是就不是考察的重点？我们还需要去仔细看吗？不用吧？

好的，进入下一段

我跟上了啊，小海豚加油

No longer. The Internet – and pressure from funding agencies, who are questioning why commercial publishers are making money from government-funded research by restricting access to it – is making access to scientific results a reality. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has just issued a report describing the far-reaching consequences of this. The report, by John Houghton of Victoria University in Australia and Graham Vickery of the OECD, makes heavy reading for publishers who have, so far, made handsome profits. But it goes further than that. It signals a change in what has, until now, been a key element of scientific endeavor.

这一段，第一句，就是No longer，“不再”，是不是和上一段的used to be产生了一个时间上的对比？说明现在在这里开始转折，开始说新事物了？
好，看第二句，两个破折号中间的内容暂时不读，因为两个破折号是什么意思？是不是和中文里的作用是一样的？相当于括号啊？是解释啊？
好，把这一句的主干单独拿出来The Internet  is making access to scientific results a reality.
是不是这一句就是这一段的主题啊？
后面提到了一个权威的机构，The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ，是不是就是要拿这个机构的一些具体事例来证明我们这一段的主题句啊？
那后面的证明就暂时不看了。记住这个机构，以免后面要问到的时候你不记得在哪里出现过了。

The value of knowledge and the return on the public investment in research depends,
in part, upon wide distribution and ready access. It is big business. In America, the core scientific publishing market is estimated at between $7 billion and $11 billion. The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers says that there are more than 2,000 publishers worldwide specializing in these subjects. They publish more than 1.2 million articles each year in some 16,000 journals.

这一段，放眼望过去，是不是暂时不说主题句是哪一个，马上就可以看出哪些内容是不需要看的？In America，这是一个具体的例子了，对不对？后面的内容都是数字啊之类的，是不是在距离论证？那么In America后面的内容，我们就都不看了，记住是在美国发生的例子就行了，如果后面问起来美国的例子，再回头来看好了。
现在看开头的两句话，是不是就是这一段的主题了啊？但是句子有点复杂，我们把主要部分挑出来。其实最重要的还是 big business对不对啊？因为后面都是在说收益的嘛。

好了，下一段

哈哈 加油吧
支持你~

我才考完普通话
最后一题可是自由发挥了！！
题目是我最喜欢的节目
说了很多都没到3分钟 最后纯粹瞎说开了

经济合作发展组织，APEC??

谢谢楼主了